- Boxes
- definitions
- Ellipses
- theorems and lemmas
- Blue border
- the statement of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Orange border
- the statement of this result is not ready to be formalized; the blueprint needs more work
- Blue background
- the proof of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Green border
- the statement of this result is formalized
- Green background
- the proof of this result is formalized
- Dark green background
- the proof of this result and all its ancestors are formalized
- Dark green border
- this is in Mathlib
Given a weight function \(w\), define \(w^*\) such that \(\mathrm{supp}(w^*) \subseteq \mathrm{supp}(w)\) and
That is \(w^*\) is a distribution with non-decreasing total edge weight with the original support of \(w\) preserved.
Given distinct non-adjacent vertices \(v_j, v_i\), define \(w^+\) by transferring \(\varepsilon {\gt} 0\) weight from \(v_j\) to \(v_i\):
with the condition \(\{ v_j, v_i\} \notin E\). The Enhance transfers weight between non-adjacent vertices to increase edge weight.
Let \(v_{\max }\) and \(v_{\min }\) be vertices attaining the maximal and minimal weights of \(w\), respectively. Set \(\varepsilon := \mathsf{the\_ \varepsilon }\) and define
In words: \(w^+\) transfers the carefully chosen \(\varepsilon \) from the heaviest to the lightest vertex.
Define a bijection
mapping edges incident to \(v_j\) (except \(s(v_j,v_i)\)) to edges incident to \(v_i\) (except \(s(v_j,v_i)\)). In words: this bijection pairs edges incident to \(v_j\) with edges incident to \(v_i\) within the clique.
Given \(w\in \mathcal{W}\) whose support induces a clique, define
to be the witness provided by Theorem 24: it preserves the zero set of \(W\), its support is a clique, satisfies \(f(w_M)\ge f(w)\), and achieves the maximal number \(K=\texttt{max\_ uniform\_ support}(w)\) of vertices with weight \(1/k\) (where \(k=|\operatorname {supp}(w)|\)).
Under Theorem 12, the change in the sum over edges incident to \(v_i\) satisfies
That is the gain vertex’s edge contribution increases by \(\varepsilon \) times the sum of its neighbors’ weights.
Under Theorem 12, the sum over edges incident to \(v_j\) satisfies
That is the loose vertex’s incident edge contributions become zero after Enhance.
The total weight transfer balances the edge contributions:
In words: the combined edge contributions of loose and gain vertices do not decrease after Enhance.
There exists \(w_M\) with \(\mathrm{supp}(w_M) \subseteq \mathrm{supp}(w)\), \(w_M.\mathrm{fw} \geq W.\mathrm{fw}\), and with at least \(m\) vertices having weight \(1/m\). In words: a maximiser \(w_M\) achieving the maximal uniform vertex count exists.
The sum over edges \(E\) of the function \(\texttt{vp}\) splits as
That is the total sum decomposes into parts incident to \(v_i\), incident to \(v_j\), and the rest.
Given non adjacent vertices \(v_i\), \(v_j\) and assuming that the neightborsum of weights at \(s_i\) is equal or greater than that of \(s_j\), we have
that is the total edge weight does not decrease after applying Improve.
The edge set \(E\) partitions as
where
In words: edges are split into the incidence set to \(v_i\), the one to \(v_j\), and the rest.